Skechers Go Run Ultra Review

A few years ago I jumped on the barefoot bandwagon when it came along, and have my 5 fingers sitting in my closet to prove it.  I enjoyed running forward on the balls of my feet, but my calf muscles never got adjusted to it.  I say this because with running, I am very willing to jump on any bandwagon that comes along because plainly said; I am a slow endurance runner.  Recently, I started migrating some Google Research to another bandwagon that is picking up momentum. The oversized running shoe.  I was noticing that a bunch of Ultra runners were changing their kicks for Hoka One Ones.  What is this new craze?  Running on more of a cushion to save knees and other injury proned joints from the jostles of running?  That seems logical but a little crazy.  I quickly jumped on the bandwagon and then purchased the cheapest pair I could find.  The Skechers Go Run Ultra.  I now have a solid month of running with these shoes and will give my review accordingly.  If over the course of this upcoming season, my opinions change, I will update this post.  I will grade this shoe on the following categories: Support, Comfort, Weight, Hype Realization, and Appearance.  Once again I will score each category with a scale of 1 to 5.  An overall letter grade will be given at the end.

Support (3.5)

The reason I knock this shoe down in this category is not for the vertical support but rather the lateral support. To specify, I mean the support that you might need when running around a corner or on an extremely sloped road surface. Granted one does not spend a lot of time doing either when road running, but I have noticed that doing anything similar to what I have described results in unsure footing or slippage in the foot box. I would be hesitant to try these shoes on a through the forest cross training run because of this feature, but in all reality I was actually expecting more instability because of the huge cushion and elevated center of mass for the shoe. For vertical up and down support this shoe is awesome and I have yet to feel an improper foot strike was caused due to lack of vertical shoe support.

Comfort (5)

Of course this is where the shoe is supposed to excel. I have been relatively impressed after my long runs to not have dead legs. I would have expected that after running on the increased cushion that new muscles or different muscles would be sore after a normal easy run and especially after long runs. However, this has not been the case. I am also pleased with how the shoe feels over the top of the foot. Snug and soft is how I would describe it. After the very first run I did have some soreness in a line on my big toe from where it was rubbing against the crease between the insole and the sidewall, but readjustment of the insole has alleviated that. I am really pleased with the comfort of this shoe. I could foresee these shoes as a perfect “all day on your feet” shoe.

Weight (4.5)

Of course the added cushion adds a little weight, but in comparing this shoe to my older pair of Brooks running shoes, I would say they were lighter due to the tops. Also in comparing these shoes with other oversized shoes, they are also considerably light. I knock it down a half a point because oversized shoes will never reach the lightness realms of minimalist shoes. That’s fine too.

Hype Realization (4.5)

I don’t really know how much hype is following this oversized shoe movement at the moment, and maybe it has passed, but for me this shoe has lived up to its hype. A few weeks after I purchased the shoe, I also noticed that it was placed on Triradar.com as the best every day training shoe for 2014, so hey, there really is some hype to it.

Appearance (5)

Of all the oversized shoes, the Go Run Ultra looks the least like a running shoe on steroids. I also really like the color options they have chosen at Skechers. I am usually a pretty conservative individual when choosing clothing options, but when I look down and see that dragon fire orange it might just make me feel a little faster.

The Letter Grade (22.5/25=0.90, A-)

Yeah, I know, picky picky, but I think the only way that I could give a shoe an A is if it made me run PR’s every time out. I am difficult to please, but overall, if I am willing to spend the time to post about it, it means that I am pleased with the product enough to recommend it. I would do so with this shoe to anyone I knew or didn’t know. It really has been pleasing to lace it up each time and put it through the works.  With only about 60 miles of running on these shoes, they still seem brand new, and I will enjoy them for this whole season.

 

 

13 Percent FTP Increase in 8 Weeks

Yeah, I know, everybody brags about large gains in a short amount of time.  Drop 10 pounds in 4 weeks, realize 10 percent on your investment in only 90 days and so on.  However, this is a post of what happened and not what someone hopes you will believe can happen so that you will purchase a product.  I will also give you the product for free because I found it amidst my searching for a free training plan.

Backstory:  I had a disappointing year on the bike.  I did not hit any of my goals during my races on the bike, and this was annoying because biking is usually my strongest discipline.  I can attribute it to a few things, or in other words give excuses, but plain and simple I just want to be faster on the bike.  So during my down month of October, I scoured the world wide web to find a PDF version of a training plan that I could carry out on my trainer during November and December.  Hunter Allen graciously made available such a plan.  Here is the link: Hunter Allen Wheelbuilder Training Plan.

I won’t bore you with the details of the workouts, but I followed it to the letter.  I think I only missed one workout, and hit every single interval.  I developed programed workouts from my Garmin Connect account that would step me through each interval of each workout.  Before I started the plan I did a 20 min FTP test and after the 8 weeks I did the same test again.  The data from the column on the right in the image below is the test done before the plan and the one on the left is the one after it.  I train on a Kurt Kinetic Road Trainer and with some back-end-calculations I obtain virtual power with the help from the following information from the vendor’s website:

The formula for the Road Machine is a cubic function. If we let S stand for “speed” in miles per hour, and P stand for “power” in watts, the formulas are as follows:

P = (5.244820) * S + (0.019168) * S3

For example, to calculate how much power is produced at a speed of 16.1mph while riding the Kinetic Road Machine, plug 16.1 in for “S.”


P = (5.244820) * (16.1) + (0.019168) * (16.1)3

P = (5.244820) * (16.1) + (0.019168) * (16.1) * (16.1) * (16.1)
P = 84.4416 + 79.9935

Power = 164.435 watts

Two FTP 20 Minute Tests before and after 8 week training plan.

Two FTP 20 Minute Tests before and after 8 week training plan.

For November 4th the average power calculated from the average speed for the 20 minute test was 235 watts.  The protocol stipulates that your FTP is 95% of that number or 223 watts.  On January 3rd the average power was 266 watts which produces an FTP of 252 watts.

BOoyah!  I know I still have a ways to go to get my FTP to where I want it (>275), but gaining that 13 percent puts me back to where I think I was mid-summer during my best year to date.  Not bad for a free training plan.